Tag: Asset-Based Finance (page 9 of 13)

Fix your cashflow with invoice finance

Two thirds of businesses have waited more than 90 days for an invoice to be settled in the last six months.

This is according to new a new survey from Sage, which also found that 45 per cent of respondents think big businesses are the worst culprits for late payment.

Late payment is a growing problem for businesses across the country. For some firms a single late payment can have a dramatic impact on cashflow, and business owners are increasingly on the lookout for ways to mitigate these problems. Invoice finance, a popular alternative funding method, may be able to help you do just that.

What is invoice finance?

Invoice finance allows you to unlock the value of your unpaid invoices. In an invoice finance arrangement you borrow against the value of those invoices, and the lender gets paid when the invoices are settled. First, you raise an invoice as normal. Then, you pass that invoice on to an invoice finance company such as Aldermore. They pay you the face value of the invoice, less an administrative fee. Depending on the type of invoice finance arrangement you are using, you then either chase the invoice yourself, or the invoice finance company does this for you.

Can I use invoice finance with the occasional invoice?

Often, invoice finance companies require you to commit to putting all or a proportion of your invoices through the invoice finance process. Many small businesses are, quite rightly, reticent to enter into long-term contracts. However, this problem is addressed by spot factoring, also known as single invoice factoring. Under a spot factoring arrangement you can choose to ‘sell’ invoices one at a time, or in small batches. This means you can get the cash when you most need it.

What are the advantages of invoice finance?

Invoice finance has a range of important advantages. The first of these clearly concerns cashflow. Late payment is a major problem amongst UK businesses, and invoice ageing remains one of the key pressures on cashflow. Invoice finance helps you to circumvent those pressures, by providing you with the cash you are owed very quickly – in fact, it is common for businesses to receive the money within as little as 24 hours.

The second advantage is flexibility. In an invoice finance arrangement you borrow against the value of your sales, and your credit lines therefore expand with your business. Some business owners prefer invoice finance to bank loans for exactly this reason: you are only borrowing what you are earning, and it is therefore very difficult to take on more debt than you can afford. Similarly, invoice finance can be more affordable than other forms of short-term finance. Many providers will offer as much as 95 per cent of the invoice’s face value.

Finally, it is also worth noting that invoice finance does not generally require a credit check. This has made this an increasingly popular option for businesses that cannot secure bank funding, either because they are so new that they do not yet have a credit history, or because their existing history is not quite up to scratch.

www.simplybusiness.co.uk

Factoring vs Invoice Discounting

Factoring vs Invoice Discounting – which works for your small business?

Invoice finance is a powerful means by which small and growing businesses can take control of the value locked up in unpaid invoices. This set of techniques can be split into two: factoring, and invoice discounting. But how do they differ, and how can they help your business?

What is invoice finance?

Invoice finance refers to a set of techniques that allow you to borrow against the value of your unpaid invoices. In an invoice finance arrangement you raise an invoice as normal, and then you pass it on to a third party invoice finance company such as Aldermore. That company then pays you a proportion of the face value of the invoice. When the invoice gets paid, the invoice finance company gets paid too.

What’s the difference between factoring and invoice discounting?

Invoice finance can be split into two categories: factoring and invoice discounting. Each of these two techniques will suit businesses in different circumstances and, perhaps, at different stages in their development.

In a factoring arrangement, you pass responsibility for collecting the debt from your client onto the third party company, which in this case may be referred to as a factor. There are several potential advantages to this arrangement. Perhaps most important of these is that you will no longer have to assume the resource burden of chasing invoices. This can be a time consuming process, and freeing yourself from it can enable you to concentrate instead on running your business.

In an invoice discounting arrangement, meanwhile, you retain control of this process. Clearly, you do not enjoy the potential time benefits associated with factoring – but, crucially, in an invoice discounting arrangement, your clients need never know that you are using invoice finance. They will settle their invoices in the normal way, and they will never have to deal with a factor. This level of discretion can be a major benefit for many businesses.

Do I have to make a long-term commitment?

Traditionally, some small and growing businesses have been put off factoring and invoice discounting because the invoice discounting company has required that they put all or a large proportion of their invoices through the system. Indeed, this is still true in many cases, and while this suits some businesses, it is impractical or unnecessary for others. In these situations, you might wish to consider spot factoring. In these arrangements you can put just one or a small ‘bundle’ of invoices through the finance process, giving you the flexibility you need.

What are the alternatives?

Invoice finance can be a highly effective means by which you can sustain and grow your business, as we explored last week in this article on invoice finance and cashflow. However, it is important to understand that it’s not the only means by which you might choose to finance your business. For more options, read our finance guide for small business.

www.simplybusiness.co.uk

Graphene: Invest with care for a long-term return

It’s the stuff of dreams… and scams. But Graphene may provide opportunities for patient investors

ANYONE doubting that Manchester is still a cutting-edge industrial city, at least in terms of its intellectual capital, need only consider graphene. In less than a decade since it was isolated by two scientists at the university, Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, this supposed wonder-material has stormed the world, winning them the Nobel prize for physics and prompting an explosion of inventive activity. At the last count, nearly 10,000 patents or patent applications have been filed globally.

Given the remarkable properties claimed for graphene – which derives from graphite and is comprised of a single layer of carbon atoms – that’s hardly surprising. The thinnest material yet created, it is ultra-light, fantastically heat conductive and tougher than steel. Yet it is also transparent and as malleable as rubber. Proponents argue it could revolutionise everything from electronics and drug delivery to food packaging and manufacturing – especially if it puts industrial 3D printing on the map. Unbreakable, foldable, touchscreens for mobile phones are just one application in the pipeline.

There are even claims that graphene could pep up love lives. Another team at Manchester is working on combining it with latex to create a stronger, thinner “more pleasurable” condom. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is so excited about the potential of this super-johnny that it has donated $20m to the project – on grounds that if more people are persuaded to use one, it could prove a significant weapon against HIV.

If the hype around graphene has been building of late, so has the financial froth. In January, the UK Financial Conduct Authority warned that boiler-room scammers had zoned in on it as an easily exploitable new niche – in the same mould as previous dodgy investments like rare earth metals and carbon credits. Indeed, as far as your average ruthless conman is concerned, graphene is in a sweet spot. Many people have vaguely heard of its super-qualities, but they don’t know it could be years before products actually hit the market. What’s more, the regulator warns, prices are “expected to fall in coming years”.

That’s true enough. Graphene is still in its research phase and production remains limited. But as more plants come online, prices will certainly fall. And there’s every sign that China – which currently leads the patent race – is gearing up for a big industrial push. The same is true in the US and South Korea and even the dozy EU has launched a €1bn research programme.

The FCA says it has yet to see any “convincing” evidence there’s a viable market for retail investors to make money. But just because graphene comes with big caveats doesn’t mean there aren’t opportunities beyond those dangled by cold-calling cowboys, who are best avoided whatever they’re peddling.

Indeed, had you backed Allied Graphene Materials – a home-grown player, spun out of Durham University – when it floated in November, you’d now be sitting on a cash-wad considerably thicker than a single layer of atoms. Shares are up more than 200 per cent from their 155p launch price. Investors are punting that AGM, which manufactures high purity, top quality graphene, is a potential national champion.

Market appetites will be tested again later this month when another graphene specialist, Haydale, debuts on Aim. Instead of making graphene, Haydale finds ways to use it which, theoretically at least, should make shares less vulnerable to price drops.

Another company with a similar remit is Cientifica, already listed on Aim, which plans to invest in early-stage graphene users and has identified several markets it thinks could be winners , including energy storage, heating, and filtration technologies

As David Thornton, who follows the market for Moneyweek, points out, early stage investments linked to exciting new technologies are always risky. But they tend to go in three phases. In the first, “investors dream of seemingly limitless upside potential”. In the second “cold light of day” phase, “the market ponders the problems of commercialising the technology” and stocks often fall back. In the third, companies start making money, shares rebound and perhaps overtake their previous peaks. “If you bide your time and pick up shares in the neglected second phase, it’s possible to find bargains.”

We’re not there yet with graphene, but this is certainly a potentially blockbuster market to monitor, if you can steer through the hype and are prepared to be patient.

www.theweek.co.uk

Manufacturing ‘missing a generation of apprentices’

There is mild optimism among staff in West Midlands after a rise in output but elsewhere chances of getting work look remote

It is a measure of returning confidence to the fortunes of BSA Machine Tools that four apprentices have been taken on over the past two years, bringing the full-time UK staff up to a total of 38. Given that in the 1960s the parent companies that became BSA Machine Tools employed about 14,000 people, this represents a very small step upwards after decades of decline. Nevertheless, staff here are inclined to be cautiously positive.

Steve Brittan, managing director at the company, which makes machine tools for the aerospace, defence, oil and automotive industries – 90% for export, feels there is a new confidence in the economy and is tentatively reaping the dividends of an export-led recovery.

He welcomed the chancellor’s vision of a Britain that makes things again, though he recognises that for his business to be successful its high-end UK headquarters will continue to be supplemented with much of its work being outsourced to more low-tech partner enterprises in China and Taiwan.

The mild optimism felt by staff here echoes the wider excitement about the surge in exports from West Midlands to China and the rapid expansion of nearby Jaguar Land Rover, which is employing thousands of new workers. But the confidence is felt in isolated pockets and has not filtered through to much of the local area, the parliamentary constituency of Hodge Hill, south Birmingham, which still has the highest level of youth unemployment and the second highest overall unemployment in the country.

Liam Byrne, Labour MP for the constituency, said many of the new jobs that had recently been created were part time, zero-hours contracts. While he welcomed signs of recovery in West Midlands manufacturing, he noted: “The flipside of that is that this new wealth is not widely shared. It sits alongside deeply entrenched poverty.”

BSA Machine Tools’ headquarters have shrunk from the vast expanse they occupied until the 1980s, with land sold to make car parks and a large bingo hall (where managers will be celebrating the chancellor’s decision to halve bingo duties to 10%), and now occupy a long narrow warehouse, where mainly elderly staff are working on three £1.7m machines for export, and are preparing to start work on a £1.1m order for two more machines that will be exported to Mexico for fracking.

“It is small beer,” he says of his modest employee expansion, but he believes the government is genuine in its commitment to supporting manufacturing. In the past year he has had breakfast with David Cameron in Downing Street, to explain the needs of manufacturers exporting abroad, and has given Vince Cable lunch and a tour of the Birmingham headquarters.

The announcement of a focus on cutting energy costs, given US industrial energy prices are half those in Britain, is welcome, since this is an issue Brittan cites as a significant obstacle to being competitive. “I think they recognise the problems caused to manufacturing by 30 years of progressive dismantling by various governments, and that’s encouraging,” he said.

The decades-long decline in manufacturing is evident on the shop floor, where there is a noticeable gulf in ages between the majority of staff and new recruits: 70% of employees are over 60, a high percentage are over 65 and three are over 70. One older staff member is instructing a new electrical apprentice, pointing out important aspects of a piece of equipment with his grey hospital crutch.

“I hope these guys will hang on in there while the apprentices come through,” Brittan said. With the decline in profitability of UK manufacturing the company shrank and stopped employing new apprentices. “It’s a microcosm of what has happened in the UK manufacturing industry and the way it has been treated.”

He thinks a corner was turned about three years ago when the value of the pound dropped, making British exports more attractive globally, and when the government began making more positive commitments to the manufacturing sector. As well as the core team in Birmingham, the company contracts in a further 800 staff in China when orders require them.

Increased willingness from banks to lend to the business over the past year and the confidence given by assurances of continued low interest rates from the governor of the Bank of England have also helped the business begin to feel more secure about its future, he said.

Andrew Manning, 25, one of the new apprentices who joined two years ago when the company took on a handful of big orders to make machines for the US oil industry, said: “There is a missing generation in terms of apprentices – we’re having to learn from the blokes who are about to retire, and they’re having to hold on until we learn more.”

He is thrilled to be in work, particularly given the bleak employment statistics in the local area, but life remains complicated even when you are working. Because he is older than the other apprentices, he earns more than the standard £5 an hour but still finds the rising cost of living in Birmingham, ever increasing rents and soaring bills a struggle and is conscious that the prospect of buying somewhere to live remains remote.

A mile from the headquarters in the offices of a community centre, the Hub, which works with marginalised young people offering free access to the internet and support with looking for work, staff do not believe the people they support are feeling the effects of a recovery. The Firs and Bromford estate sits on the other side of the M6 from the Jaguar Land Rover site, but the charity has yet to help anyone find work there.

“We’re not in Cornwall where there are no jobs, but there is a disconnect,” said Paul Wright, branch director of Worth Unlimited, the charity that oversees the centre. Although the car manufacturing plant was visible from the windows of the estate’s tower blocks, locals felt finding work there was only a remote possibility.

This area is in the top 1% most deprived wards in England. Statistically “it has all the highs that you wouldn’t want to be high and all the lows that you wouldn’t want low: high unemployment, high deprivation, social exclusion; low educational attainment, levels of skills”, Wright said.

“All those statistics are there. People here do have talents and skills, the willingness to work, but there are problems with access to jobs. We see the Range Rover success story, and they are taking on people – but the jobs that tend to be available are agency, zero hour, night shifts, with no long-term security.”

He conceded that: “If you look hard, there are some positive signs,” and described the happy case of a 30-year-old man who had been unemployed for a long time and recently got a job with Land Rover, at a different site, a bit further away. His success is used to try to inspire other job-seekers who come in looking for work.

“It does help to be able to tell people about this person who got a job. There’s nothing more inspiring than that,” he said, but he conceded that this job too was a short-term placement through an agency, on a zero hour contract, night shifts, and with no long-term security.

“Technically he doesn’t actually work for Land Rover because he is contracted through an agency. Still, in this climate he is a success story. That’s why we’re celebrating him.”

[The Guardian]

A sounder pound: new £1 coin unveiled

12-sided new £1 coin unvieled design reprises threepenny bit as Royal Mint and Treasury say existing coin is too easy to forge

A new 12-sided pound coin based on the threepenny bit is being unveiled – and is said to be the hardest in the world to fake.

Described as a “giant leap into the future” the new coin will replace a familiar token that the Treasury says has a 3% forgery rate – amounting to a total of more than 45m in circulation.

The coin is based on the historic three pence piece, also known as the “threepenny bit”, which was the first coin to feature a portrait of Queen Elizabeth II.

But unlike its predecessor the new coin – which will be roughly the same size as the existing one when introduced in 2017 – will contain an array of technological advances making it difficult to forge.

As well as a “bimetallic” construction similar to the existing £2 coin, the new £1 will feature new banknote-strength security pioneered at the Royal Mint’s headquarters in Llantrisant, South Wales.

A Treasury spokesman said: “After 30 years’ loyal service the time is right to retire the current £1 coin and replace it with the most secure coin in the world.

“With advances in technology making high value coins like the £1 ever more vulnerable to counterfeiters it’s vital that we keep several paces ahead of the criminals to maintain the integrity of our currency.

“We are particularly pleased that the coin will take a giant leap into the future, using cutting edge British technology while at the same time, paying a fitting tribute to past in the 12-sided design of the iconic threepenny bit.”

The Royal Mint chief executive, Adam Lawrence, hailed the “exciting project”, adding: “The current £1 coin design is now more than 30 years old and it has become increasingly vulnerable to counterfeiting over time.

“It is our aim to identify and produce a pioneering new coin which helps to reduce the opportunities for counterfeiting, helping to boost public confidence in the UK’s currency in the process.

“We’re extremely proud that the proposal includes the Royal Mint’s Integrated Secure Identification System (iSis) technology, offering greater currency security at a lower cost.”

As with all British coins the Queen’s effigy will be on the “heads” side, while the Treasury has said there will be a public competition to decide the design for the “tails” side.

A Bank of England spokesman said: “Coins are the responsibility of the Royal Mint and together with the Bank’s decision to produce polymer banknotes this change will enhance the security and integrity of the currency.”

National Crime Agency counterfeiting expert John Sheridan said: “The issuing of a new coin with enhanced security features will make it more difficult for criminals to copy as well as presenting increased opportunities for law enforcement to investigate and disrupt the producers and distributors of counterfeit currency.”

[The Guardian]

Rural Crime

National rural crime plan launched to protect communities

TWO of Britain’s largest national crime-fighting organisations have joined forces to crack down on rural criminals.

Launching the initiative between Crimestoppers and the Neighbourhood and Home Watch Network at the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) rural crime conference in Birmingham today (Wednesday), Crimestoppers chief executive Mark Hallas said a ‘coalition approach’ was needed to tackle the growing problem.

The campaign will focus on raising awareness of rural crime, the signs to look out for and how information can be passed to Crimestoppers anonymously. It will be the first time that both charities have worked together nationally to tackle crime directly.

Rural crime costs the farming industry millions of pounds each year.

Mr Hallas, said: “Crime within the rural communities is a prevalent issue that should not be ignored and should instead be tackled by those who can help bring the number of incidents down.

“Crimestoppers is committed to supporting those affected by rural crime and we hope that by pairing up with our partner organisations, and with the help of the public, we can start to bring those responsible to justice.”

Both organisations, the police, public and businesses, including farmers, will share information via a national website and communication system called Rural Alert, an addition to the national database and communication system Neighbourhood Alert, used by the Neighbourhood and Home Watch Network.

Jim Maddan, Chairman for the Neighbourhood and Home Watch Network, added: “As technology advances so do criminals and we need to work together to be one step ahead. Criminals do not stop committing crime because they are travelling into another county or police force area.

“By adopting a national approach, boundaries disappear and information becomes more apparent. By sharing the information on what we do know about this type of crime, the public and businesses can really have an impact on helping the police to catch the small minority of people affecting many rural communities”.

The Neighbourhood Alert system is used by 10 police forces as well as several Fire and Rescue Services, Resilience Forums and local authorities.

Hundreds of thousands of people have registered for free via one of the 70 sites that use the Alert system.

In the last year over 20,000 farmers have joined a Farm or Country Watch website powered by Alert.

Rural Alert gives farmers and any rural community the opportunity to register free of charge, receive messages and report information.

For more information visit www.ourwatch.org.uk

[Farmers Guardian]

Business confidence at record high

A survey of UK business confidence by the accountancy industry body the ICAEW has recorded its highest reading yet – although a lack of export growth is giving cause for concern.

The construction sector is experiencing a strong recovery – although it has not yet returned to pre-crisis levels

The survey, which is produced with Grant Thornton, said confidence has increased for six quarters in a row.

The report is the latest to suggest the economic recovery is well established.

However, ICAEW also said there were concerns about the structure of the economy as export growth had failed.

Stumbling blocks

Their Business Confidence Monitor (BCM) said businesses reported the fastest investment growth since 2008, but growth in exports is expected to fall back.

Michael Izza, chief executive of ICAEW, said: “The export figures are disappointing and show that the government’s strategy is not working.

“We would like to see an increase in export guarantees to match the scale that German companies benefit from.”

As well as continued weak export growth, the BCM found other stumbling blocks for the economic recovery included skills shortages.

Its survey suggested the recent positive trend shown in the official employment numbers would continue, with respondents returning to job creation.

The brightest sectors were construction and banking, with confidence sharply higher among builders although output remains below its pre-crisis peak.

The latest reports from a string of housebuilders have shown buoyant sales – and profits – as government initiatives, such as Help to Buy, which is designed to help buyers of new properties, underpins demand.

Among bankers and those in the insurance industry confidence was at a record high, as they continue to recover from the aftermath of the financial crisis.

The survey found turnover and profit growth both picked up and business expect this to continue for the rest of this year.

[BBC News]

Yellow Plant Finance

Yellow Plant Finance

It is a common term heard in the Construction and Farming Industries. It refers to large construction equipment items such as diggers, excavators, tractors and cranes etc. These business sectors, along with others, require such equipment as a vital part of their companies operations. However, they do tend to be costly items, new as well as used equipment for businesses. Richmond Asset Finance Ltd want to provide businesses in these sectors with the cheapest option for obtaining finance for these types of equipment.

Some businesses will avoid tying up their working capital by not going for direct purchase and opting instead for a leasing arrangement for construction equipment. This removes the ownership right but does reduce the cost, and gives the business owner the option to provide a final balloon payment to own the asset outright if desired.

Some businesses will simply prefer to enter into a new lease deal for the latest model, removing maintenance and repair costs from their budget and depreciation costs for accounting purposes.

However, other businesses will prefer to own the asset outright, especially if they have invested in a high-quality model that is likely to have a useful working life of many years. In such instances, it can be far more cost-effective to buy rather than lease. Businesses will often make the purchase via a finance agreement rather than taking money from their reserves and introducing a cash-flow risk into the business.

The right finance product provided by Richmond Asset Finance Ltd, can save money and time for the business. The wrong product can leave the business with a liability they wish they didn’t have for several years in the future. For this reason, many businesses are now seeking to work with specialist business finance providers such as ourselves rather than approach high-street banks. This is why Asset Finance has fast become the third most popular finance option since the start of the credit crunch.

We’re specialists in our field and our sole aim is to help businesses find the right finance for their circumstances from loans with fixed repayment schedules to part-funded loans with variable or staged repayment arrangements, all of which offer tax advantages.

So if you need any help or want to ask us some questions then contact us today!

Report forecasts 30,000 extra construction jobs by 2018

Demand for new homes could fuel the creation of nearly 30,000 extra construction jobs in Scotland over the next five years, a report has claimed.

The Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) said the private housing sector was expected to see average annual growth of 4.7%.

It cited the Scottish government’s Help to Buy scheme as an aid to growth.

The scheme helps eligible buyers with an equity loan of up to 20% of the purchase price of a new-build home.

CITB also forecast that major housing projects would provide a boost to the sector.

They include a £100m eco village in Aberdeen and a £1.5bn sustainable housing development in the Douglas Valley.

The report by CITB’s Construction Skills Network (CSN) suggested private housing, infrastructure and industrial projects would provide the biggest boosts for the industry in 2014.

However, the report added that average annual growth in output for the construction industry over the next five years was expected to be 2%, slightly below the rest of the UK.

‘Encouraging and challenging’

CITB Scotland director Graeme Ogilvy said the CSN figures were “both encouraging and challenging”.

He said: “The positive news for industry is that unemployment fell faster in Scotland in 2013 than anywhere else in the UK.

“However as an industry with the highest level of hard-to-fill vacancies, the onus is on ensuring there is a trained and highly-qualified workforce in the pipeline ready to fill almost 30,000 vacancies over the next five years.

“Projected growth across Scotland’s private housing sector growth will be pivotal to the industry’s growth over the next five years and we note the early success of the Scottish government’s Help to Buy (Scotland) scheme since its introduction in September 2013.”

He added: “As the second largest driver of growth, infrastructure will be every bit as significant for Scotland’s construction industry, with major projects such as the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route and the new Forth Replacement Crossing, to name just two, driving employment and output opportunities.”

[BBC News]

There’s no quick fix for the UK’s personal debt crisis

Welfare changes mean many councils and housing associations now view debt as a welfare issue rather than a money management problem

It’s Debt Awareness Week. The irony is, once you’re in debt, you’re actually very aware. Continual reminders and calls normally mean you can’t forget or escape your situation.

Evidence of the impact of welfare changes suggests that actions are being taken early on council tax and rent arrears. We recently dealt with a client whose medical certificate had been lost by the jobcentre and so had her benefits cut for four weeks until they found it. During that time the council sent bailiffs to her house for rent arrears. She was lucky that after appeal the additional charges weren’t added to her bill.

Many councils and housing associations now view debt as a welfare problem rather than a debt and money management problem. Resources that could be spent on specialist debt advisers are being shifted to welfare rights.

The root causes of debt have always been the same: changes in circumstances/income and irresponsible borrowing or lending. These are not caused by high-cost credit, welfare changes or low wages but they are made worse by it. Few policy responses have tried to address each of these issues so I can suggest a few here.

Changes in income generally occur when you move home, apply for changing benefits, or start – or lose – a job. Mainstream debt awareness would provide mandatory access to support at these key moments. Being made redundant should include free access to debt advice. Timely intervention can make you “debt aware” before you need to be.

There is no full-proof way to stop someone lying or borrowing irresponsibly, but what’s clear is that having faced legal action there is often no way back. It is unsurprising that people using high-cost credit do so because no one else will lend to them owing to adverse credit histories. That’s not a route back, it’s a route for a life of debt.

Much has been discussed about high rates of interest but the reality is that most problems are caused by people being lent to irresponsibly – by mainstream lenders as well as sub-primes that fail to check potential borrowers’ income or financial commitments. This is a recipe for disaster, as many borrowers are finding. Sadly the burden of the impact falls on them much more than the creditor. The role for an affordable lending principle and sharing the impact more equally is more important than ever before.

Tackling the personal debt crisis in the UK has no short quick fix. It requires a commitment of epic proportions by all parties – creditors, borrowers and regulators – to change their behaviour and give people a way out.

[The Guardian]

Manufacturing companies are expected to be major player

Manufacturing firms are expected to feature prominently in an influential list which celebrates the pace-setters in Yorkshire’s businesscommunity.

The Yorkshire Fastest 50, organised by the Yorkshire Post in association with law firm Ward Hadaway, has been highlighting and celebrating the fastest growing companies across the region since 2011.

In the build-up to the 2014 Yorkshire Fastest 50 awards, analysis of previous years has revealed the growing influence of manufacturers and engineers.

The inaugural awards in 2011 saw seven companies from the manufacturing and engineering sector make the list, which ranks profit-making businesses according to their rate of annual turnover growth. Those businesses accounted for a total of just over £140m in turnover in the 2011 rankings.

In 2012, there were eight manufacturing and engineering companies accounting for £176.7m of total turnover and last year, there were 10 companies from that sector in the final 50, producing a total turnover of £191.6m.

The sector also provided one of the three award winners in 2013 with Magma Ceramics and Catalysts named as the Fastest Growing Medium Sized Company.

The Dewsbury-based company makes ceramics and catalysts for a range of industrial applications and has customers across the world, as well as manufacturing operations in Brazil and Vietnam.

The full A to Z list of the 2014 Yorkshire Fastest 50, along with information on their activities, will be revealed in the Yorkshire Post next month.

Awards will then be handed out to the fastest growing small, medium and largebusinesses at an awards ceremony in March, with one of those three winners also being crowned Yorkshire’s overall fastest growing business.

[Yorkshire Post]

Last chance for £250k towards farming training

The AgriFood ATP is able to help fund your studies if you meet their eligibility criteria.

If you are a UK resident and are employed by a company that has an R&D or manufacturing presence in the UK agrifood sector*, you are likely to be eligible for a bursary to cover 100% of your course fee.

100% bursaries are available until the end of 2014 when the subsidy rate will fall to 75% until the end of 2015.

* The ‘agrifood sector’ is defined as ‘an enterprise engaged in and/or providing services to businesses in agriculture, the manufacture of farm machinery and equipment, the processing of food and drink and the wholesale and retail activities associated with food and drink.’

To be eligible for a bursary, you must work for more than 7 hours per week in an organisation that has a site in the United Kingdom and that meets the above criteria.

Time is running out for farmers, advisers and other allied professionals to make use of a £250,000 funding pot for training schemes.

The funding is via the AgriFood Advanced Training Partnership. But it is the last year that this type of 100% bursary is available, according to partnership manager Deborah Kendale.

“We have at least £250,000 to allocate, which would allow 200 to 300 people to benefit, depending on the length of course taken,” Ms Kendale said.

A one-week course costs £1,400, while day courses cost £350. Anyone in paid work for more than seven hours a week in an agrifood-related business can apply.

Since January 2012, the partnership has awarded nearly £600,000 in part-time training. It has provided more than 400 people from across the UK with a range of training, from one-day soil and water workshops to in-depth crop protection courses.

But in 2015, funding will drop to 75% for UK-based agrifood professionals looking for a short course or a part-time postgraduate qualification.

Interest on many courses has been high, particularly on our Potato Production and Management course based at Harper Adams, Ms Kendale said.

The partners delivering the courses are the University of Nottingham, Cranfield University, Harper Adams University and Rothamsted Research and training is at an advanced level. However it is not necessary to have studied a degree to attend a short course or one or more workshops.

Course bursaries are provided by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and have enabled delegates from all backgrounds and industries from family run farms right up to multinational companies such as Agrii and Frontier to take part.

[AgriFood & Farmers Weekly]

Co-op pulls sale of general insurance arm

Co-operative Group decides against sale of insurance business following revised recapitalisation process at banking arm

The Co-operative Group has opted to hold on to its general insurance business, ten months after putting it up for sale.

The decision was made as the mutual no longer needs the money the sale could have brought in, following a revision of the plans to fill the Co-op Bank’s £1.5bn black hole.

It comes despite what are understood to be a series of strong second round bids, from suitors including Legal & General and private equity house AnaCap.

Co-op management, led by chief executive Euan Sutherland, felt that the bids undervalued the business given its growth potential and value to the group overall.

Analyst estimates as to its worth varied between £250m and £600m.

The mutual originally decided to part with the business in March 2013 as part of plans to bolster the Co-op Bank’s capital position.

Proceeds from the sale of the general insurance arm – and the life insurance arm, which was sold to Royal London for £219m last July – were intended to be used to safeguard the future of the bank.

Following the discovery of a £1.5bn capital shortfall at the bank last summer, the requirement for the proceeds intensified yet further.

Under the Co-op Group’s original recapitalisation plans for the bank, the group was due to fund £1bn, with £500m coming from bondholders.

However, following a redrafting of those plans in November, distressed debt funds which held a significant portion of the Co-op Bank’s debt opted to inject a greater amount, meaning the Co-op Group’s funding requirement reduced from £1bn to £462m.

In a statement, the Group said that the decision to hold on to general insurance was part of Mr Sutherland’s wider strategic wider review, the details of which are expected as early as its annual results in March.

In addition to the sale of its life insurance arm, the Co-op Group said it would look to the “strategic management” of property assets across the group – which is understood to relate to plans for a series of sale-and-leaseback.

Mr Sutherland commented: “Having considered the sale process, and in light of the changed requirements on us under the Bank recapitalisation process, we believe it is in the best interests of our members, customers and colleagues, that we retain this strong business and develop it further.”

The news follows The Telegraph’s weekend report that the Co-op Group is to cut its £850,000 annual donation to the Labour Party as a result of the problems at its banking arm.

Lord Myners, who is carrying out a review of the mutual’s corporate governance and relationship with third parties, confirmed that his study will lead to a reduction in the funding the Co-op gives to the party.

“The scale of giving to others cannot go unaffected by the change in the Co-op’s economics,” said Lord Myners. “It’s got less money to spend on everything.”

“As a member-owned organisation, do you spend what money you have on pricing, on the dividend, on the retail estate, or on charitable giving? The new reality requires a question of priorities,” he continued.

[Telegraph News]

Cement companies ‘overcharging by £50m a year’

Watchdog orders creation of a fifth player after two-year investigation finds lack of ‘well-functioning market’

Two of the UK’s biggest cement companies will be forced to sell facilities after the UK’s competition watchdog found that the four biggest companies’ grip on the market is costing consumers £50m a year.

The Competition Commission (CC) ordered the creation of a fifth entrant into the cement market on Tuesday, ordering Lafarge Tarmac and Hanson to sell off plants.

The CC’s two year investigation found that “both structure and conduct in the cement sector restrict competition by aiding coordination between the three largest producers (Lafarge Tarmac, Cemex and Hanson), which results in higher prices for all cement users”.

It said that despite a slowdown in construction levels during the economic downturn, the cement companies’ profitabilty and market shares had remained stable.

“These three producers have refrained from competing vigorously with each other by focusing on maintaining market stability and their respective shares,” the watchdog said.

The fourth member of the market, HCM, was established a year ago under the CC’s orders after the UK business of France’s Lafarge and Anglo American-owned Tarmac merged.

A spokesman for the watchdog said the market issues existed before the merger, so the market was uncompetitive even with a new player in HCM.

There were fears that the economic recovery could be curtailed by the high cost of cement, with demand picking up.

The CC has ordered Lafarge Tarmac to sell one of its cement plants in either Cauldon, Staffordshire or Tunstead, Derbyshire. Hanson will also have to sell one of its facilities that produces ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), a substitute for cement.

New restrictions on publishing data and on price announcements to suppliers will also come into force.

It said that the lack of cement competition was costing customers at least £30m a year and more in future as demand picks up, and £15m-£20m a year for GGBS.

It is believed the process could take around 18 months, although an appeal from the cement manufacturers is likely.

“We believe that the entry of a new, independent cement producer is the only way to disturb the established structure and behaviour in this market which has persisted for a number of years and led to higher prices for customers,” said Martin Cave, who chaired the inquiry.

“Despite falling demand and increasing costs during the last few years, profitability among GB producers has been sustained and their respective markets shares have changed little. This is not what you would expect to see in a well-functioning market, under these circumstances.”

Lafarge shares were down 1.3pc in France in early trading.

[Telegraph]

Landowners facing hefty bills after flooding nightmare

Landowners facing major disruption caused by flooding may also have to fork out for repair work on neighbouring properties, the CLA has warned.

The Association said Government budget cuts could mean the repair bill could be passed on via the Private Nuisance law.

Private Nuisance is where a defendant causes a ‘substantial and unreasonable interference with a [claimant]’s land or his use or enjoyment of that land’.

Dozens of flood alerts remain in place today (Monday) as forecasters predict a return to stormy weather on Wednesday.

The south of England is expected to bear the brunt of the unsettled conditions.

CLA member Stephen Watkins currently has 100 ha (250 acres) of arable farmland under water and believes the idea of landowners being liable for flood defences is appalling.

Mr Watkins, of Seven Stoke, Worcester said: “It is absolutely horrifying that landowners may be liable for private nuisance claims if neighbours are hit by flooding.

“We accept the risk of being on a flood plain but the lack of maintenance of waterways is the big issue. If this were carried out efficiently, less money would need to be spent on flood defences.

“If we try to carry out maintenance ourselves to help prevent flooding, we are chastised for it. If neighbouring land floods due to the defences failing on our land, we may be liable. It feels like we are getting stick from all directions.”

The CLA said that despite predictions of more extreme weather to come, government cuts to flood defence jobs will leave farmland and communities unprotected.

Landowners could be left to stump up the costs for flood defences themselves.

CLA deputy president Ross Murray added: “Landowners must be able to carry out flood defence work where needed but not so as to create an unintended liability which would be both unfair and a disincentive for action.

“The recent flooding has shown the importance of our flood defences, and it is crucial that, despite the planned cuts, the Environment Agency prioritises them.

“Defence of land is in the national interest and, in the face of these cuts, red tape must be reduced to allow farmers to protect it.”

« Older posts Newer posts »